[COMPARE-CHART]

Desktop SLS: Complete System vs. Open Platform

You're ready to bring professional, in-house 3D printing using Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) to your company. The parts work well, and the return on investment is clear. But choosing isn't just about comparing technical specs. It's about choosing a work process philosophy. As of 2025, the desktop SLS market has two main and very different approaches, perfectly shown by the Formlabs Fuse 1+ and the Sinterit Lisa X.

This analysis isn't about picking a "winner." It's a detailed guide for engineers, product designers, service companies, and research labs to understand the main trade-off at the center of this decision. We will examine the smooth, all-in-one experience of a closed system and compare it with the material freedom and deep customization of an open system. Our goal is to help you choose the right platform for your specific uses, budget, and in-house technical skills.

Quick Comparison: Different Philosophies

Before a detailed breakdown, it's important to understand the core ideas driving each machine. This isn't just about features; it's about the intended user experience and the long-term effects on your operations.

The Formlabs 'It Just Works' Philosophy

The Formlabs Fuse 1+ system is built on a simple, powerful idea: to make industrial-quality SLS printing as easy and reliable as possible. This is done through a tightly controlled, fully integrated system where every part is designed to work together smoothly. A closed system, in this context, means predictability and ease of use are the top priorities.

Smooth Workflow to Part

The user experience with the Fuse 1+ is a perfect example of guided operation. It starts with importing a CAD file into Formlabs' PreForm software. The software's algorithms are perfectly tuned for Formlabs' specific materials, automatically handling part positioning and arrangement to maximize build density and success rates. The interface is clean, minimizing the settings a user needs to manage.

Once the job is sent, the printer takes over with a one-click print process. The real magic of the system shows itself in post-processing. The printed "cake" of powder is moved from the printer to the Fuse Sift, a single unit that handles part extraction, powder recovery, and powder mixing. Unused powder is automatically filtered and stored, ready to be mixed with fresh powder for the next job. From the Sift, parts can move to the Fuse Blast, an optional but highly recommended automated media blasting system for a final, professional finish.

The main user benefit of this integration is a huge reduction in the learning curve. It minimizes the potential for operator error and dramatically shortens the time from "send to print" to having a production-ready part in hand. This makes it an ideal solution for busy engineering teams or environments where multiple operators with different skill levels will use the machine.

Material Advantage: Consistency

Formlabs' approach to materials is a core part of its system. The company offers a carefully selected collection of proprietary powders, such as Nylon 12, Nylon 11, Nylon 12 GF, and TPU 90A. Each material is extensively tested and validated, with pre-loaded print settings that guarantee consistent results right out of the box.

For the user, this means that the mechanical properties listed on the data sheet are the properties you can expect in your final parts, every single time. There is no need for user-side parameter tuning, trial-and-error, or process validation when switching between Formlabs materials. This level of reliability is essential for low-to-mid volume production, functional prototyping where properties must be trusted, and any application where part-to-part consistency is critical.

Closed System Trade-Offs

The strengths of this "closed garden" approach are also the source of its built-in limitations. The most significant trade-off is being locked into a single material supplier. Users must purchase powders directly from Formlabs or their authorized sellers, at Formlabs' set prices. This can lead to higher long-term operational costs compared to an open system where you can shop for competitively priced third-party materials.

Furthermore, the closed system prevents experimentation. If your application requires a specialty material not offered by Formlabs—such as a specific color, a polypropylene (PP) powder, or a custom-mixed polymer for research—the Fuse 1+ is not the right tool. This makes it less suitable for pure R&D labs or material science applications where the goal is to push the boundaries of what is possible.

Sinterit: The Power of Choice

The Sinterit Lisa X represents the opposite philosophy. It is designed as an open platform that gives the user maximum control and flexibility, particularly regarding materials and print settings. This approach empowers advanced users to optimize every aspect of the printing process to fit their specific needs, from cost to performance.

Open Powder System Freedom

The single most significant advantage of the Lisa X is its open material system. While Sinterit offers its own line of optimized powders, the machine is fully compatible with materials from third-party suppliers. This has major implications for the user.

First, it opens the door to significant long-term cost savings. Users can source standard powders like PA12 or PA11 from a competitive market, drastically reducing the cost per kilogram and, consequently, the cost per part. Second, it unlocks a vast universe of materials. The ability to print with flexible powders, ESD-safe materials for electronics jigs, polypropylene for chemically resistant parts, or even experimental materials makes the Lisa X an incredibly versatile tool. This is a critical advantage for service companies needing to meet diverse client demands and for R&D labs developing novel applications.

Expert Control with Sinterit Studio

This material freedom is enabled by the Sinterit Studio software. Where PreForm focuses on simplicity, Sinterit Studio focuses on control. It provides access to over 32 distinct printing parameters, allowing users to fine-tune everything from laser power and scan speed to the temperature of different heating zones.

For an expert user, this is an invaluable toolbox. It allows you to develop and save unique printing profiles for new third-party materials. You can optimize for a specific outcome—for example, increasing speed for a draft-quality part or adjusting parameters to achieve maximum detail on a complex geometry. This level of detailed control is essential for materials research and for squeezing every last bit of performance and efficiency out of the machine.

The Responsibility of Flexibility

The power of an open platform comes with an equal measure of responsibility. The flexibility to use any material means the burden of process validation falls on the user. When introducing a new third-party powder, you must invest time and material in dialing in the correct print parameters to achieve reliable, high-quality results. This requires a higher level of operator expertise and a more methodical approach than a closed system.

The workflow is also naturally modular. While Sinterit offers a suite of post-processing tools like the Sinterit ATEX Vacuum and Sandblaster, the user is responsible for building their own end-to-end workflow. This can involve sourcing equipment from different manufacturers and integrating it into a unified process. While this offers flexibility, it can be more complex and require more initial planning than the all-in-one Formlabs solution.

Performance and Practicality

Beyond philosophy, the technical specifications of each machine directly impact throughput, part cost, and capability. Here is how they compare in real-world terms.

Build Volume and Throughput

The Formlabs Fuse 1+ features a build volume of 165 x 165 x 300 mm. The Sinterit Lisa X offers a slightly different geometry at 130 x 180 x 330 mm. While the raw volumes are comparable, the specific dimensions can influence how efficiently you can arrange parts. The taller Z-axis on both machines is advantageous for vertical stacking of small components.

However, true throughput is a function of more than just build volume. It is the combination of print speed, cooldown time, and post-processing efficiency. A full build on either machine can take between 24 and 48 hours, including printing and cooling. The key question for calculating weekly output is how quickly you can "turn over" the machine—unloading a finished build, processing the parts and powder, and starting the next job. Here, the integrated and semi-automated nature of the Fuse Sift can provide a time advantage over a more manual, modular workflow.

Speed and Laser Power

As of 2025, both the Fuse 1+ and the Lisa X use powerful 30W galvo-steered lasers. This puts them on equal footing in terms of raw sintering power and speed, a significant leap from the 5W-10W lasers common in earlier desktop SLS models. This higher power allows for faster scanning, which directly reduces print time, especially on densely packed build chambers. The practical difference in speed for a given part will often come down to the software's scanning strategy and the specific parameters used, particularly on the open Lisa X platform.

Inert Gas Atmosphere

A key differentiator is the use of an inert gas atmosphere. The Fuse 1+ features an optional nitrogen input, which creates an oxygen-depleted environment inside the build chamber. This is a standard feature on most industrial SLS machines. An inert atmosphere improves the thermal stability of the process, leading to better part quality, more consistent surface finish, and reduced powder degradation. Crucially, it is essential for printing certain materials like Nylon 11 and TPU, which are sensitive to oxidation at high temperatures.

The Lisa X also offers a nitrogen connection as an essential option for users wanting to print a wider range of materials beyond standard PA12. For any user planning to work with materials other than basic nylons, considering the nitrogen option on the Lisa X is critical to achieving results comparable to the Fuse 1+.

The Post-Processing Reality

Post-processing is a labor-intensive part of SLS. The Formlabs solution (Fuse Sift and Fuse Blast) offers an integrated, contained, and streamlined experience with a defined footprint and cost. It is designed to be a single package deal.

Sinterit's approach is modular. You can purchase their dedicated sandblaster and ATEX-rated vacuum or choose to integrate third-party solutions that may better fit your space, budget, or existing workshop infrastructure. This pick-and-choose method gives you control but requires more research and self-integration. The footprint and total investment can vary significantly depending on the choices made.

Calculating True Cost of Ownership

The sticker price of a 3D printer is only the beginning of the story. A professional evaluation requires a thorough analysis of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over several years of operation.

The Full Initial Investment

For a fully functional setup, the initial investment goes far beyond the printer itself.
For the Fuse 1+, a complete package typically includes the printer, the Fuse Sift (for depowdering and recycling), a build chamber, a powder cartridge, and a service plan. The Fuse Blast is an additional, but highly recommended, purchase for automated cleaning.

For the Lisa X, the initial purchase includes the printer, but you must also budget for essential peripheral equipment. This includes a sandblasting cabinet, an ATEX-certified vacuum for powder handling, a powder sieve, and a starter set of materials. The nitrogen connection is another cost to consider if advanced materials are planned. When priced out, a complete, production-ready setup for both systems often falls into a similar investment bracket.

Ongoing Costs: The Powder Equation

This is where the two philosophies diverge most sharply in financial terms. With the Fuse 1+, you purchase proprietary powders at a fixed price. The powder refresh rate—the ratio of fresh to used powder required for the next print—is also fixed by the manufacturer, typically between 30% and 50%. This creates a predictable, but potentially higher, cost per gram.

With the Lisa X, the open system allows you to purchase third-party powders, which can be substantially cheaper than OEM materials. Furthermore, experienced users can experiment with and optimize the powder refresh rate. By carefully tracking part quality, it is sometimes possible to safely use a lower refresh rate (e.g., 20% fresh), which further reduces running costs.

To illustrate, consider a hypothetical scenario: If your lab prints 10kg of PA12 powder per month, and a third-party powder is 40% cheaper than the proprietary equivalent, the material cost savings with the Lisa X could amount to thousands of dollars over a single year.

Service, Maintenance, and Labor

Both companies offer comprehensive service plans, which are a wise investment for these complex machines. Compare the cost and structure of these plans.

Finally, consider the hidden cost of labor. The Fuse 1+ is designed to require less operator expertise and hands-on time, particularly with its streamlined post-processing. The Lisa X, especially when using new materials, requires a skilled operator to invest time in process development and validation. The value of your team's time should be a critical factor in your TCO calculation.

Making Your Final Choice

The decision between the Formlabs Fuse 1+ vs Sinterit Lisa X should not be based on which is "better," but on which philosophy aligns with your organization's goals. Are you building a repeatable manufacturing process or a flexible research laboratory?

The Formlabs Fuse 1+ is likely the better fit for:
* Teams that need a reliable, repeatable process with minimal configuration.
* Businesses where ease-of-use and high throughput are more valuable than ultimate material flexibility.
* Environments with multiple operators of varying skill levels who need to produce consistent parts quickly.

The Sinterit Lisa X is likely the better fit for:
* R&D departments, universities, and material scientists who need to experiment with a wide range of polymers.
* Service companies and businesses aiming to minimize long-term operational costs through competitive material sourcing.
* Expert users and small teams who are comfortable with parameter tuning and enjoy having detailed control over the printing process.

Before you request a quote, ask your team the crucial question: Is our primary goal streamlined production or ultimate flexibility? Your answer will point you toward the platform that is not just a machine, but a true long-term partner for your innovation.