Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus

Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus

VS
Elegoo Neptune 4 Max

Elegoo Neptune 4 Max

Why choose Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus?

  • - Fast bed heating (2-3 minutes to 60°C)
  • - Compact footprint for a large-format printer
  • - Lower power consumption (320W heated bed)
  • - Excellent balance of build volume and practicality
  • - Same high-quality features as Max but more convenient

Why choose Elegoo Neptune 4 Max?

  • - Massive 420x420x480mm build volume
  • - Dual-zone heating system for efficiency
  • - Perfect for single-piece large cosplay items
  • - Maximum batch printing capacity
  • - Dual gantry support braces for stability

The Verdict: Which is right for you?

Choose Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus if:

The Neptune 4 Plus is a powerful, fast, and remarkably capable large-format printer that represents a fantastic and practical balance of size, speed, and day-to-day convenience. It is 'enough' for the vast majority of users, including those with highly ambitious projects.

Choose Elegoo Neptune 4 Max if:

The Neptune 4 Max is a specialty tool for makers who have a clear and present need for its huge build volume. It demands more in terms of space, stability, and patience, but delivers unmatched capacity for creating massive, single-piece prints.

Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus vs Neptune 4 Max: Which Large-Format Printer to Choose in 2025?

On this page

[COMPARE-CHART]

Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus vs Max: Is "Plus" Enough, or is the Max Worth the Wait?

I. At the Large-Format Crossroads

You're ready to start big 3D printing projects, and Elegoo's Neptune 4 series gives you two great large-format choices. But picking between them isn't easy. You're facing a tough decision with two key questions: Is the Neptune 4 Plus's big build space enough for what I want to make? And does the long heat-up time of the Neptune 4 Max's huge bed cause too many problems in daily use?

This complete 2025 guide goes deeper than basic feature lists. We'll give you detailed, practical analysis based on over a year of user experiences and testing. Our goal isn't to tell you which one to pick, but to give you the knowledge to confidently choose which printer works best for your projects, your workspace, and your patience level.

We will answer the main questions directly. How do you figure out if the Plus's build space is big enough for what you need? What are the real heat-up times for the Max's bed, and how does this affect your daily printing schedule? Finally, what are the small, often missed differences in performance and usefulness that can make or break your experience? Let's explore these questions.

II. At a Glance: Plus vs. Max

For those who need the key differences right away, this quick reference table shows the main features and how they directly affect your printing experience.

Feature Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus Elegoo Neptune 4 Max The User Impact
Build Volume 320 x 320 x 385 mm 420 x 420 x 480 mm The main decision factor. Sets the maximum single-piece object size.
Physical Footprint Approx. 533 x 517 x 638 mm Approx. 658 x 632 x 740 mm A major space consideration. The Max needs a dedicated, large, and stable surface.
Heated Bed 320W, Single Zone 1000W, Dual Zone (250W inner / 750W outer) The Max's dual-zone helps reduce slow heating for smaller prints, but the overall power use and time-to-temp for the full bed is a key trade-off.
Structural Support Gantry support brace Double gantry support braces The Max needs extra bracing to maintain stability and print quality across its larger frame.
Typical Heat-Up (Bed to 60°C) ~2-3 minutes ~8-12 minutes (full bed) This is the main workflow question. Is an extra 5-9 minutes of waiting time okay for you?

III. The Core Question: Is "Plus" Enough?

The most important step in this decision is to honestly think about your project goals. The term "large format" means different things to different people, and the abilities of the Neptune 4 Plus are often underestimated.

What the Plus Prints

For a huge range of projects, the 320x320x385 mm build volume is more than enough. It hits a sweet spot that handles ambitious prints without requiring the compromises of a truly massive machine.

Cosplay and armor makers will find that most full-sized helmets, such as those for Mandalorian or Clone Trooper costumes, can be printed in one seamless piece. Parts like forearm guards, shoulder pieces, shin guards, and other medium-to-large armor pieces fit easily on the build plate.

For practical prints, the Plus works great. You can make large custom organizers for your workshop, custom cases for complex electronics projects, and big components for multi-part mechanical assemblies. The volume is also perfect for batch printing, letting you make a large number of smaller items at the same time, boosting your efficiency for personal projects or small-scale sales.

When You Need the Max

The need for the Neptune 4 Max comes up when your projects cross a specific size limit or when your printing approach puts single-piece production above everything else.

The most common reason is one-piece cosplay. If your goal is to print a full-size chest plate, a large back plate, or big props like fantasy swords and shields without splitting the model and dealing with seams during finishing, the Max is your answer. The 420x420 mm bed is specifically designed for these types of single large prints.

In professional settings, the Max serves large-scale prototyping needs. This includes architectural models where an entire floor plan can be printed at once, furniture prototypes for comfort testing, or full-scale engineering parts that simply will not fit within the 320mm boundary of the Plus.

For small business production, the math can also favor the Max. If efficiency is measured by maximizing the number of items per print run, the larger bed offers a clear advantage. For example, a plate that fits 16 small products on the Plus might hold 30 or more on the Max, significantly reducing the number of print cycles and operator work required.

A Quick Self-Check

Answer these questions to clarify your needs:

  • Do your main projects consistently have a dimension larger than 320mm?
  • Is printing large items in a single, seamless piece a must-have requirement for you?
  • Do you plan to run a print farm where maximizing units-per-plate is your top priority?

If you answered "Yes" to any of these, the Neptune 4 Max is a strong choice. If you answered "No" to all of them, the Neptune 4 Plus is likely the more practical and efficient choice for your needs.

IV. The Heated Bed Problem

The most-discussed trade-off for the Neptune 4 Max is its bed heat-up time. This single factor can significantly influence your daily workflow and is worth examining in detail.

The Physics of Heating

The reason for the delay is simple thermal mass. The 420x420mm aluminum plate on the Max is much larger and heavier than the 320x320mm plate on the Plus. Just as it takes longer to boil a large pot of water than a small one, the Max's bed requires significantly more energy (1000W vs 320W) and more time to bring its entire surface to a stable, even temperature.

Real-World Heat-Up Times

Our testing and community data from 2025 provide consistent, real-world numbers. When heating the bed to a standard 60°C for PLA printing, the difference is clear.

The Neptune 4 Plus is a model of efficiency. It consistently reaches 60°C in about 2 to 3 minutes. This is fast enough that it rarely feels like a waiting period in any workflow.

The Neptune 4 Max presents two very different scenarios, thanks to its smart dual-zone heating:

  • Inner Zone Only (150x150mm): When printing a small object placed in the center, you can turn on only the inner 250W heating zone. In this mode, the heat-up time is a very good ~2 minutes, on par with the Plus. This makes the "slow bed" criticism a non-issue for small, quick prints.
  • Full Bed (420x420mm): To heat the entire surface, the printer uses both the inner and outer heating zones for a combined 1000W. Here, you should expect a wait of 8 to 12 minutes. This is where the practical trade-off becomes real and must be considered.

A Workflow Perspective

Is an extra 8-minute wait truly a problem? The answer is personal and depends entirely on your printing habits. Let's put it in context. For a 24-hour print of a large helmet, an additional 8 minutes of pre-heating accounts for less than 0.6% of the total job time. It is, in the big picture of that print, very small.

Furthermore, compare this wait time to other necessary prep tasks. Finding and slicing a complex model, carefully cleaning the PEI build plate, checking filament, and loading the file can easily take 5 to 10 minutes. An experienced user often starts the bed pre-heating process at the beginning of this routine, meaning the bed is ready by the time they are. In this scenario, the heat-up time is absorbed into the existing workflow.

The "annoyance factor" becomes most noticeable during rapid testing. If you are printing a series of small test objects back-to-back and using the full bed for placement flexibility, the 10-minute wait between each short print can feel disruptive. For long, "set it and forget it" prints, it's a minor footnote at the beginning of a long journey.

How to Reduce Wait Time

The community has developed several effective strategies to manage the Max's heat-up time.

First and foremost, use the dual-zone heating feature whenever possible. If your print fits within the central 150x150mm area, using the inner zone exclusively is the single best way to get a fast start.

Adopt a pre-heat routine. Start the bed heating command from the touchscreen or Klipper interface while you are still at your computer finalizing the G-code file.

Consider an enclosure. A simple, readily available printer tent can trap ambient heat around the machine. This not only improves print quality for temperature-sensitive materials like ABS and ASA but can also modestly reduce bed heat-up times by creating a warmer starting environment.

V. Beyond the Bed: Subtle Differences

While the build volume and bed heating are the primary talking points, several other practical differences between the Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus and Max deserve consideration.

Footprint and Stability

The physical space commitment for the Neptune 4 Max cannot be overstated. It isn't just a bit bigger; it is a massive machine. Its footprint of roughly 658 x 632 mm requires a large, sturdy workbench. Importantly, you must also account for the significant front-to-back clearance needed for the Y-axis bed movement. Measure your intended space carefully before committing.

This increased size requires greater structural reinforcement. The Max features dual gantry support braces, one on each side, compared to the single brace on the Plus. These are essential for managing the physics of a larger, heavier print head assembly moving rapidly over a much wider X-axis span. To prevent print quality issues like ringing or ghosting, maintaining proper gantry alignment and V-wheel tension is more critical on the larger frame of the Max.

Power and Operating Costs

A brief note on power consumption is in order. The 1000W peak draw of the Neptune 4 Max's heated bed is more than triple that of the 320W bed on the Plus. While this power is used most intensively during the initial heat-up phase and then intermittently to maintain temperature, it represents a noticeably higher peak load. This is a consideration for your home's electrical circuits, especially in older buildings, and will contribute to slightly higher long-term energy costs compared to the Plus.

Where They Are Identical

It's equally important to recognize where these printers are the same. This shared foundation ensures a consistent core experience.

Both machines run Klipper firmware out of the box. This is the "brains" behind their impressive speed, enabling high print speeds of up to 500 mm/s (with a typical, quality-focused speed of around 250 mm/s).

They also share the same excellent extrusion system. The high-temperature (300°C) direct-drive extruder is a capable and reliable workhorse, able to handle a wide range of filaments from standard PLA and PETG to more demanding materials like TPU, ABS, and Nylon.

The day-to-day user experience is also identical. Both printers use the same precise 121-point auto bed leveling system, a filament runout sensor that saves long prints, and the same detachable magnetic touchscreen interface. If you can use one, you can use the other with zero learning curve.

VI. User Archetypes: Who Is Each For?

To help you find your fit, let's profile the ideal user for each machine. See which description matches most with you and your making style.

The Ideal Plus User

This is the ambitious hobbyist. You want to print helmets, large functional parts, and complex multi-part projects. You are pushing beyond the limits of standard desktop printers but do not have a recurring need to produce objects that are over a foot and a half wide. You value a healthy balance of build volume, speed, and practicality.

This user is also the prototyper with space constraints. Your workshop, office, or studio is a functional space, not a warehouse. You need a large build volume to realize your ideas but cannot dedicate an entire heavy-duty workbench to a single machine. The Plus offers a powerful large-format experience without completely taking over your space.

The Ideal Max User

This is the dedicated cosplay and prop maker. Your primary goal is to create the largest armor pieces and props possible with minimal seams and post-processing. For you, build volume is the number one, non-negotiable priority. The time spent gluing and sanding a seam is more valuable than the time spent waiting for a bed to heat up.

This user is also the maker who values ultimate possibility. You may not have a specific giant project planned for today, but you want the absolute, uncompromised freedom to print whatever you can imagine tomorrow. You understand and accept the trade-offs in physical space, power draw, and heat-up time as a fair price for that boundless capability.

VII. Conclusion: Your Project Defines Your Printer

Ultimately, the choice between the Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus and Neptune 4 Max is not about which machine is objectively "better." It is about which machine is the right tool for your specific job.

The Neptune 4 Plus is a powerful, fast, and remarkably capable large-format printer. It is "enough" for the vast majority of users, including those with highly ambitious projects. It represents a fantastic and practical balance of size, speed, and day-to-day convenience.

The Neptune 4 Max is a specialty tool. It is for the maker who has a clear and present need for its huge build volume. It demands more from you in terms of space, stability, and a little more patience, but in return, it delivers an unmatched capacity for creating massive, single-piece prints.

Review your list of dream projects, measure your available space, and be honest about your tolerance for workflow interruptions. The right answer isn't on a spec sheet or in a review; it's in your creative vision. Choose the printer that removes limitations from your workflow, not the one that creates new ones for your specific situation.

VIII. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Are there print quality differences between the Plus and Max on same-sized objects?

When both printers are properly set up and tuned, they can produce prints of identical quality. However, the greater mass of the Max's gantry and bed means that maintaining that high quality at very high speeds can require more careful maintenance over time. Keeping belts tight and the gantry perfectly square is more critical on the larger frame to avoid artifacts.

Q2: Since it's 2025, have there been any must-have community upgrades for these models?

Both models are highly capable right out of the box. Common enhancements that have gained popularity include upgrading the stock heat break to an all-metal version for those who frequently print with high-temperature materials like Nylon or PC for extended periods. For the Neptune 4 Max specifically, more robust and custom-fitted enclosure solutions are popular to help stabilize the ambient temperature for sensitive filaments and further reduce bed heating times.

Q3: Do both printers use the same firmware and slicer profiles?

They use the same Klipper-based firmware, providing an identical software interface on the machine itself. However, due to their different physical dimensions, bed sizes, and structural characteristics, they require separate, machine-specific slicer profiles. Elegoo provides excellent base profiles for common slicers, and the active community has developed a wide array of highly-tuned profiles for various materials and print speeds. You cannot use a Plus profile on a Max or vice versa without significant modification.

Zurück zum Blog